
Does e-prescribing affect market share? IMS Health says yes
Updated study probes details of the anti-cholesterol market in 2011-12
E-prescribing—rather than writing scrips that patients take to the pharmacy—is being used by the majority of physicians, according to data by
According to a white paper just published, a review of the anti-cholesterol market during January 2011 to December 2012 shows that e-prescribing is more pronounced among top-decile prescribers, and that while the number of prescribers going electronic increased at double-digit rates for low-decile prescribers, they were flat or slightly declining for top-decile ones. “Most high-volume prescribers have been e-prescribing for some time,” notes Chris Blenk, a senior principal in IMS Health’s Commercial Effectiveness Practice, and one of the authors of the report. “While slightly more than 50% of physicians we studied use e-prescribing, they are responsible for nearly 90% of the prescriptions filled in this category.”
Additionally, the data show that when a generic is introduced (as was the case in 2011, when Pfizer’s Lipitor [atorvastatin] went off-patent), e-prescribers switched to generics more rapidly than traditional prescribers. “Generally speaking, generics fare better in an e-prescribing environment, and branded products worse, due to stricter generic-switching policies by many payers,” says Blenk. E-prescribers chose non-atorvastatin generics 55.1% of the time, versus 52.8% for traditional prescribers, and generic atorvastatin 19.3% of the time, versus 19.0% for traditional. Further, there are signs that among branded products, some fare better with e-prescribing, and some worse. There can be a variety of reasons for this; Blenk says that pharma manufacturers generally need to be aware of how their drugs are presented in e-prescribing systems, particularly with how clinical information is presented, and how accurate payer coverage is reported.




