
Philip Sclafani: Will PBM Reform Actually Lower Net Drug Costs?
PwC's Philip Sclafani discusses oral GLP-1 cost exposure, oncology drug spend under the medical benefit, and his outlook on PBM reform.
PwC's Behind the Numbers 2027
The discussion opens with a question PC put to Sclafani about whether
From there, the conversation shifts to oncology, which the report identifies as a structural backbone of pharmacy spend growth. IQVIA reported that US cancer medicine spending reached $143 billion in 2025, and that oncology spending is expected to increase by nearly 60% by 2030, driven largely by antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, and other premium-priced therapies.2 PwC's report notes that these drugs are typically administered and billed under the medical benefit rather than the pharmacy benefit, placing them outside many of the formulary tools payers use to manage traditional drug spend.¹
The interview closes with Sclafani's assessment of PBM reform. The report stops short of concluding that current transparency and delinking efforts will reduce what plans and employers ultimately spend, and Sclafani expands on that distinction directly.
In this second installment of his conversation with PC, Sclafani discusses whether the oral GLP-1 approval changes payer cost exposure heading into 2027, what levers plans realistically have to manage medical-benefit oncology spend, and why he believes PBM reform may shift the drug pricing model, but not necesarily lower net costs.
References
- PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). Behind the Numbers: Medical Cost Trend. PwC Health Research Institute. Accessed June 19, 2026.
https://www.pwc.com/us/en/industries/health-industries/library/behind-the-numbers.html - IQVIA Institute. U.S. Medicine Use Trends 2026. IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science. Published April 28, 2026. Accessed June 19, 2026.
https://www.iqvia.com/insights/the-iqvia-institute/reports-and-publications/reports/us-medicine-use-trends-2026




